- A further run targets 10/10 in every category. During filming, Soul has given all tens, while Opus gives mostly tens with 9.5 for color and contrast.
22:5623:24 - Theo adds a specific preference: restore color because the earlier design has become too grayscale. This supplies direction beyond the numerical score.
23:43 - In the new screenshots, he prefers the clearer merge button, more visible icons, improved contrast, and less washed-out appearance. He also notices a darker main view and changed focus states. These are Theo's visual judgments.
24:0024:24 - Muse eventually gives 10/10 after previously remaining around 7.5 while other models gave nines. Theo also calls out improved syntax readability in light mode.
25:5126:15 - Theo's explanation is that the prompt encodes his own review process: inspect the new screenshot, compare it with the previous version and other products, score it, and repeat. He describes the skill as basic rather than dependent on a hidden design technique.
25:2725:51 - His conclusion is that agents can make useful progress when given a way to measure success and iterate. He considers programmatic scores preferable to the subjective model reviews used for this UI experiment.
26:4831:05
Chapter notes
Final design pass and human judgment
Theo - t3․gg · 31:44 · English
Not readFinished this chapter?